[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/j/ - Janitor & Moderator Discussion

Name
Options
Comment
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.



Been some discussion about the sudden deletion of Bear threads on /lgbt/, so I thought I'd grab a little clarification since I haven't actually seen the threads themselves.

The "bear" community (burly gay men) is part of the lgbt community, so it would seem fine in its essence. Now, if they're becoming /soc/ hook-ups or porn dumps, I can understand that.

It's really more of a curiosity and nobody's archiving lgbt yet, so I can't go look for myself.
>>
I've seen them and they've been ONLY porn dumps (/hm/ material) or hook ups (/soc/ material), not a curiosity. If any are in fact curiosity or anything that pertains to /lgbt/, then of course they will be left untouched.



Delete Post: [File Only]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.