how wansn't it their fault?
Just an update, seems like the old /g/ attacks have been solved, users could go to a certain website which would then flood the /g/ board under the normal user's IP address.
Ofcourse it's still good to let the mods and/or managers know about any form of attacks, posting here, and more efficiently, on the IRC Channel.
>>315
You're right about that, though, (Correct me if I'm wrong :)) most moderators are PST, which occassionally ends up with no moderator currently surveying the boards, so just flagging a board which is under attack could take a while to be solved, thus a chance for a massive flood.
Just tell me if I'm wrong, I'm just giving you my point of view, and since I'm new I could very well be wrong.
>>338
Point taken.
Usually highlighting mods on IRC that are at the PC gets a faster response (Assuming they don't just surf the web) than flagging.
I suppose it's best to flag a board and highlight/notify a mod on IRC at the same time.
By the way, just an insight, what about creating some sort of validation code for each reply made (just 2 digits or something). That pretty much would block any program from spamming replies. But ofcourse things like these don't happen often, and users will probably dislike validating their replies all the time. It could be considered an alternative method of prevention.