[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/j/ - Janitor & Moderator Discussion
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Comment
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous
/co/ - is Miyazaki acceptable? 11/13/06(Mon)00:46 No.426
/co/ - is Miyazaki acceptable? Anonymous 11/13/06(Mon)00:46 No.426
http://cgi.4chan.org/co/res/366562.html
Someone posted a thread in /co/ about grave of the fireflies (which while not technically miyazaki, was made by his studio). Some people told him he shouldn't post that in /co/, and some people said that someone declared Miyazaki (i.e. princess mononoke, kiki's delivery service, spirited away, howl's moving castle etc) as /co/ acceptable. Is this the case or should the thread be deleted?
>>
Anonymous
11/13/06(Mon)02:49 No.428
Anonymous 11/13/06(Mon)02:49 No.428
Ah, well, I think they showed whether or not they could have the occasional "classic" anime thread... the thread descended into nothing but flaming so I deleted it.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
Delete Post: [File Only]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.