[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/j/ - Janitor & Moderator Discussion

Name
Options
Comment
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.



File: 1463572585748.jpg (239 KB, 848x848)
239 KB
239 KB JPG
What do you think of the bump limits and other parameters on the boards you use? For reference, the current bump limits are 750 on /qst/ and /vg/, 500 on /a/, /co/, /mlp/, /news/, /r9k/, /soc/, /sp/, /v/, and /vr/, and 300/310 on all other boards.

All regular boards (meaning not-/f/, which has 30 threads per page but only one page) have 10 pages and 15 threads per page except /pol/, which has 20. Image limits are 300 on /jp/ and /vip/, 250 on most "fast" boards and 150 on most other boards.

Thoughts / requests / comments?
>>
The 310 part is really dumb and I wish it would go back to 300.
>>
i always thought limits were already metered for balancing server load with discussion needs. thought has gone into setting those numbers the way they are, imo nothing needs to be changed
>>
>>5809
This.

Why 310? What are those 10 posts going to give users?



Delete Post: [File Only]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.