[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/j/ - Janitor & Moderator Discussion

Name
Options
Comment
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.



File deleted.
Lately, there have been a lot of posts (usually requests, tbh) for pics of Midna from Twilight Princess over on /h/, and almost always with this image (second result on GIS if you're interested). These always erupt into arguments of is she/isn't she furry. Those who claim she isn't say that she's no different from a catgirl or a Mithra from FFXI, just that she looks a little weirder. I've been deleting them because they're either requests or flamebait, but I was wondering what the rest of you thought, or if I could get an official ruling on the matter.
>>
this has been brought up a few times in /r/, usually ending in flames. i might be able to buy the anti-furry argument ("creature of shadow" they say. whatever), but every hentai pic i see of her in that first form just screams loli. and judging from the flame posts i read before i nuke the thread, most of /r/ agrees with me.
>>
I've only seen one picture of her that was both mature and human-like... Everything else, IMO, belongs in /d/, if anywhere.
>>
furry
>>
not furry. do NOT make ban requests for this and simply label them 'furry,' i will be honest in saying i hardly ever check the validity of a janitor's ban request and always ban for furry. midna is awesome. she's not an animal-derived humanoid, nor does she have fur. she's just a weird colored/shaped humanoid, and a cute one at that. i understand that probably the only places on 4chan she fits are /b/ and /d/, but she's not furry. thanks.
>>
>>689

And sort of in /v/. But 99% of the time it always turns into a thread full of porn.
>>
>>708
yeah that's kind of a horrible idea
>>
Presently the debate of weither or not midna is furry is going on everywhere in the whole world and an answer isnt yet reached.

It's been established that midna porn is not allowed outside /b/ and /d/ so let me clarify a few things.

If we examine most of the art we'll probably notice things:

1. Most midna porn is drawn in a style typically associated with furry artwork.
this is the main reason the debate is going on.
2. Negative reception on /d/
This is kind of up in the air. A few people have seen good reception of the art while others, including me, have seen a mostly negative reception.
3. DOGFUCKING
I'm not sure how common this is but I've seen it a lot. This in itself is against /d/'s rules


for now we're deleting midna porn in /d/ due to those reasons but we arent banning the users who post it.
>>
>>723
I've seen the dogfucking in /h/, yes.



Delete Post: [File Only]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.