[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/j/ - Janitor & Moderator Discussion

Name
Options
Comment
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.



File: justice4jannies.png (983 KB, 1067x800)
983 KB
983 KB PNG
Particularly the "title" segment, which is sometimes used for cunnyposting.
I think we do this already with jpegs and exif? Would it be much work to do this with webm.
>>
>>7623
i asked about this some weeks ago. i was told it would be looked into
>>
>>7623
It's very useful for storing the artist when uploading music and prevents a ton of "SAUACE??" comments
>>
>>7628
Ehhh I always leaned on file name for that.
>>
>>7629
Almost nobody except the original uploader names the file correctly. What exactly are they 'cunnyposting' in a short text metadata field, a url to CP?
>>
>>7638
It's just stuff like "i love cunny", etc, with the intention that another anon notices (and they do eventually). It is specially egregious in the context of clips of preschool shows where there is a fixation on some character (on /co/)
>>
developer request: have sex
>>
>>7628
I've also used the title metadata for webms frequently for sauce, and removing it would be received as a feature degradation.
It was intentionally included for this purpose, no?



Delete Post: [File Only]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.