[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/j/ - Janitor & Moderator Discussion

Name
Options
Comment
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.



File deleted.
A while ago there was a thread where a moderator banned a user for posting a screencap of his music files, claiming that it was pointless attention whoring. Since then, it has kind of been an unwritten rule that screencaps of collections are not allowed to be posted. However, some of them are popping up again and they are being reported. What is the offical ruling on what to do with them?
>>
Consider Global Rule #6
"The quality of posts is extremely important to this community. Contributors are encouraged to provide high-quality images and informative comments."
under this it says that quality is important, so what is this user posting a screenie of his folders doing? if does not serve a purpose and or the user could have found a more comprehensive and relevent pic, why did they even post it?
you should also consider /mu/ rule #2
"Trolling, instigating, or participating in a flamewar will result in a ban."
what is the user trying to incite?
insightful conversation or a shitty thread?

please consider these when making your judgement. it is a very case by case basis
>>
>>949
Thanks for that. I'd imagine that "shit sux, amirite guys" posts should go, while "This is what I like, what else could you suggest?" would be ok.



Delete Post: [File Only]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.