>>53437
>Thoth was talking about the naga serpent people, the dogons speak of em too - africans say if you got spotted by a reptoid you had to haul ass to your loved one and make actual pure love, if it was fake they would kill you both on the spot.
lel
I'll put it to you this way. More people screwing = higher chance of pregnancy = more human containers. If it doesn't get done properly, you get picked off from the Peking order. Sound like a good way to encourage human beings to procreate too much?
Why are you talking about Thoth in the first place? Aren't all deities in a sense supposed to be representations of these entities, more or less?
>this whole human species present today was altered down from an androgynous primeval template.
You need to substantiate that, though it is stated in a few mythologies, not just the biblical kind, that certain deities were involved in creating the distinction of 'male and female.' Zeus in Greek mythology is one such example.
I will be looking for more than just certain myths for proof of this. I am getting the impression you rely too much on 'spirit science.'
>also check out world of warcraft's history and lore, that and diablo is made by blizz - a masonic company owned by ACTIVISION.
Explain the Free Mason bit as well, please.
>all their shit is mostly based on lovecraft+tolkien which they themselves where occultist and lovecraft's shit is pretty much 95% of everything horror scifi or paranormal futuristic etc, they all used his stuff.
I can at least accept this, Lovecraft was very clued up on symbols and the esoteric; the Old Ones being his equivalent to Watchers. Cthulhu is meant to be part sea monster, and part dragon, with a humanoid appearance.
As for Tolkien; yes, he did state to close associates that his books were not metaphorical and were based on what he thought was a hidden history, but the Orcs are a poor physical representation of the Archons, more likely representing another ethnic group in this world; only Sauron's Eye makes this point tangible.