[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / arepa / ausneets / tacos / vg / vichan / zoo ]

/fringe/ - Fringe

Esoteric Wizardry
Winner of the 84rd Attention-Hungry Games
/tg/ - 8chan's leading board in actual discussion

Infinity Cup Draw Stream - August 4th, 3PM Eastern, 7PM UTC
July 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Flag *
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


RulesMetaModerator LogLibraryArchivesFAQFringe GuideRanksCSS/fringe//asatru//4chon//ask/#looshFringechan

The rules are simple and mostly apply to the creation of threads on /fringe/:
1. No duplicate threads of topics that already exist unless the previous thread has hit the bump limit
2. No making threads just to ask questions, actually present substantial information if you're going to make a thread
3. No creating new threads purely to no-effort shitpost (you will be forgiven if it's a major GET)
4. Post threads that fall under the subject matter of /fringe/ (creepypasta is not allowed here, take that to /x/)
5. Respect anonymity. No identifying posts.
6. Do not sit on the default flag or post with no flag all the time
7. Do not raid/attack the board
8. Meta board discussion goes in >>>/fringemeta/
If the board goes up for claim and the board owner can't be found anywhere, please contact chanseywrites@hotmail.com to give the board to her. To contact the board owner send an email to fringewizard@pm.me

Tipp's Fringe Bunker

File: 0d19180ff28839f⋯.jpg (112.48 KB, 960x720, 4:3, slide_3.jpg)

 No.109794

THE UNIVERSE AS A HOLOGRAM

DOES OBJECTIVE REALITY EXIST,

OR IS THE UNIVERSE A PHANTASM?

In 1982 a remarkable event took place. At the University of Paris a research team led by physicist Alain Aspect performed what may turn out to be one of the most important experiments of the 20th century. You did not hear about it on the evening news. In fact, unless you are in the habit of reading scientific journals you probably have never even heard Aspect's name, though there are some who believe his discovery may change the face of science.

Aspect and his team discovered that under certain circumstances subatomic particles such as electrons are able to instantaneously communicate with each other regardless of the distance separating them. It doesn't matter whether they are 10 feet or 10 billion miles apart.

Somehow each particle always seems to know what the other is doing. The problem with this feat is that it violates Einstein's long-held tenet that no communication can travel faster than the speed of light. Since traveling faster than the speed of light is tantamount to breaking the time barrier, this daunting prospect has caused some physicists to try to come up with elaborate ways to explain away Aspect's findings. But it has inspired others to offer even more radical explanations.

University of London physicist David Bohm, for example, believes Aspect's findings imply that objective reality does not exist, that despite its apparent solidity the universe is at heart a phantasm, a gigantic and splendidly detailed hologram.

To understand why Bohm makes this startling assertion, one must first understand a little about holograms. A hologram is a three- dimensional photograph made with the aid of a laser.

 No.109795

To make a hologram, the object to be photographed is first bathed in the light of a laser beam. Then a second laser beam is bounced off the reflected light of the first and the resulting interference pattern (the area where the two laser beams commingle) is captured on film.

When the film is developed, it looks like a meaningless swirl of light and dark lines. But as soon as the developed film is illuminated by another laser beam, a three-dimensional image of the original object appears.

The three-dimensionality of such images is not the only remarkable characteristic of holograms. If a hologram of a rose is cut in half and then illuminated by a laser, each half will still be found to contain the entire image of the rose.

Indeed, even if the halves are divided again, each snippet of film will always be found to contain a smaller but intact version of the original image. Unlike normal photographs, every part of a hologram contains all the information possessed by the whole.

The "whole in every part" nature of a hologram provides us with an entirely new way of understanding organization and order. For most of its history, Western science has labored under the bias that the best way to understand a physical phenomenon, whether a frog or an atom, is to dissect it and study its respective parts.

A hologram teaches us that some things in the universe may not lend themselves to this approach. If we try to take apart something constructed holographically, we will not get the pieces of which it is made, we will only get smaller wholes.

This insight suggested to Bohm another way of understanding Aspect's discovery. Bohm believes the reason subatomic particles are able to remain in contact with one another regardless of the distance separating them is not because they are sending some sort of mysterious signal back and forth, but because their separateness is an illusion. He argues that at some deeper level of reality such particles are not individual entities, but are actually extensions of the same fundamental something.

To enable people to better visualize what he means, Bohm offers the following illustration.


 No.109796

Imagine an aquarium containing a fish. Imagine also that you are unable to see the aquarium directly and your knowledge about it and what it contains comes from two television cameras, one directed at the aquarium's front and the other directed at its side.

As you stare at the two television monitors, you might assume that the fish on each of the screens are separate entities. After all, because the cameras are set at different angles, each of the images will be slightly different. But as you continue to watch the two fish, you will eventually become aware that there is a certain relationship between them.

When one turns, the other also makes a slightly different but corresponding turn; when one faces the front, the other always faces toward the side. If you remain unaware of the full scope of the situation, you might even conclude that the fish must be instantaneously communicating with one another, but this is clearly not the case.

This, says Bohm, is precisely what is going on between the subatomic particles in Aspect's experiment.

According to Bohm, the apparent faster-than-light connection between subatomic particles is really telling us that there is a deeper level of reality we are not privy to, a more complex dimension beyond our own that is analogous to the aquarium. And, he adds, we view objects such as subatomic particles as separate from one another because we are seeing only a portion of their reality.

Such particles are not separate "parts", but facets of a deeper and more underlying unity that is ultimately as holographic and indivisible as the previously mentioned rose. And since everything in physical reality is comprised of these "eidolons", the universe is itself a projection, a hologram.

In addition to its phantomlike nature, such a universe would possess other rather startling features. If the apparent separateness of subatomic particles is illusory, it means that at a deeper level of reality all things in the universe are infinitely interconnected.

The electrons in a carbon atom in the human brain are connected to the subatomic particles that comprise every salmon that swims, every heart that beats, and every star that shimmers in the sky.

Everything interpenetrates everything, and although human nature may seek to categorize and pigeonhole and subdivide, the various phenomena of the universe, all apportionments are of necessity artificial and all of nature is ultimately a seamless web.


 No.109797

In a holographic universe, even time and space could no longer be viewed as fundamentals. Because concepts such as location break down in a universe in which nothing is truly separate from anything else, time and three-dimensional space, like the images of the fish on the TV monitors, would also have to be viewed as projections of this deeper order.

At its deeper level reality is a sort of superhologram in which the past, present, and future all exist simultaneously. This suggests that given the proper tools it might even be possible to someday reach into the superholographic level of reality and pluck out scenes from the long-forgotten past.

What else the superhologram contains is an open-ended question. Allowing, for the sake of argument, that the superhologram is the matrix that has given birth to everything in our universe, at the very least it contains every subatomic particle that has been or will be – every configuration of matter and energy that is possible, from snowflakes to quasars, from bluü whales to gamma rays. It must be seen as a sort of cosmic storehouse of "All That Is."

Although Bohm concedes that we have no way of knowing what else might lie hidden in the superhologram, he does venture to say that we have no reason to assume it does not contain more. Or as he puts it, perhaps the superholographic level of reality is a "mere stage" beyond which lies "an infinity of further development".

Bohm is not the only researcher who has found evidence that the universe is a hologram. Working independently in the field of brain research, Standford neurophysiologist Karl Pribram has also become persuaded of the holographic nature of reality.

Pribram was drawn to the holographic model by the puzzle of how and where memories are stored in the brain. For decades numerous studies have shown that rather than being confined to a specific location, memories are dispersed throughout the brain.

In a series of landmark experiments in the 1920s, brain scientist Karl Lashley found that no matter what portion of a rat's brain he removed he was unable to eradicate its memory of how to perform complex tasks it had learned prior to surgery. The only problem was that no one was able to come up with a mechanism that might explain this curious "whole in every part" nature of memory storage.

Then in the 1960s Pribram encountered the concept of holography and realized he had found the explanation brain scientists had been looking for. Pribram believes memories are encoded not in neurons, or small groupings of neurons, but in patterns of nerve impulses that crisscross the entire brain in the same way that patterns of laser light interference crisscross the entire area of a piece of film containing a holographic image. In other words, Pribram believes the brain is itself a hologram.


 No.109798

Pribram's theory also explains how the human brain can store so many memories in so little space. It has been estimated that the human brain has the capacity to memorize something on the order of 10 billion bits of information during the average human lifetime (or roughly the same amount of information contained in five sets of the Encyclopaedia Britannica).

Similarly, it has been discovered that in addition to their other capabilities, holograms possess an astounding capacity for information storage–simply by changing the angle at which the two lasers strike a piece of photographic film, it is possible to record many different images on the same surface. It has been demonstrated that one cubic centimeter of film can hold as many as 10 billion bits of information.

Our uncanny ability to quickly retrieve whatever information we need from the enormous store of our memories becomes more understandable if the brain functions according to holographic principles. If a friend asks you to tell him what comes to mind when he says the word "zebra", you do not have to clumsily sort backÿ through ome gigantic and cerebral alphabetic file to arrive at an answer. Instead, associations like "striped", "horselike", and "animal native to Africa" all pop into your head instantly.

Indeed, one of the most amazing things about the human thinking process is that every piece of information seems instantly cross- correlated with every other piece of information–another feature intrinsic to the hologram. Because every portion of a hologram is infinitely interconnected with ever other portion, it is perhaps nature's supreme example of a cross-correlated system.

The storage of memory is not the only neurophysiological puzzle that becomes more tractable in light of Pribram's holographic model of the brain. Another is how the brain is able to translate the avalanche of frequencies it receives via the senses (light frequencies, sound frequencies, and so on) into the concrete world of our perceptions.

Encoding and decoding frequencies is precisely what a hologram does best. Just as a hologram functions as a sort of lens, a translating device able to convert an apparently meaningless blur of frequencies into a coherent image, Pribram believes the brain also comprises a lens and uses holographic principles to mathematically convert the frequencies it receives through he senses into the inner world of our perceptions.

An impressive body of evidence suggests that the brain uses holographic principles to perform its operations. Pribram's theory, in fact, has gained increasing support among neurophysiologists.

Argentinian-Italian researcher Hugo Zucarelli recently extended the holographic model into the world of acoustic phenomena. Puzzled by the fact that humans can locate the source of sounds without moving their heads, even if they only possess hearing in one ear, Zucarelli discovered that holographic principles can explain this ability.

Zucarelli has also developed the technology of holophonic sound, a recording technique able to reproduce acoustic situations with an almost uncanny realism.

Pribram's belief that our brains mathematically construct "hard" reality by relying on input from a frequency domain has also received a good deal of experimental support.


 No.109799

It has been found that each of our senses is sensitive to a much broader range of frequencies than was previously suspected.

Researchers have discovered, for instance, that our visual systems are sensitive to sound frequencies, that our sense of smell is in part dependent on what are now called "osmic frequencies", and that even the cells in our bodies are sensitive to a broad range of frequencies. Such findings suggest that it is only in the holographic domain of consciousness that such frequencies are sorted out and divided up into conventional perceptions.

But the most mind-boggling aspect of Pribram's holographic model of the brain is what happens when it is put together with Bohm's theory. For if the concreteness of the world is but a secondary reality and what is "there" is actually a holographic blur of frequencies, and if the brain is also a hologram and only selects some of the frequencies out of this blur and mathematically transforms them into sensory perceptions, what becomes of objective reality?

Put quite simply, it ceases to exist. As the religions of the East have long upheld, the material world is Maya, an illusion, and although we may think we are physical beings moving through a physical world, this too is an illusion.

We are really "receivers" floating through a kaleidoscopic sea of frequency, and what we extract from this sea and transmogrify into physical reality is but one channel from many extracted out of the superhologram.

This striking new picture of reality, the synthesis of Bohm and Pribram's views, has come to be called the holographic paradigm, and although many scientists have greeted it with skepticism, it has galvanized others. A small but growing group of researchers believe it may be the most accurate model of reality science has arrived at thus far. More than that, some believe it may solve some mysteries that have never before been explainable by science and even establish the paranormal as a part of nature.

Numerous researchers, including Bohm and Pribram, have noted that many para-psychological phenomena become much more understandable in terms of the holographic paradigm.

In a universe in which individual brains are actually indivisible portions of the greater hologram and everything is infinitely interconnected, telepathy may merely be the accessing of the holographic level.

It is obviously much easier to understand how information can travel from the mind of individual 'A' to that of individual 'B' at a far distance point and helps to understand a number of unsolved puzzles in psychology. In particular, Grof feels the holographic paradigm offers a model for understanding many of the baffling phenomena experienced by individuals during altered states of consciousness.

In the 1950s, while conducting research into the beliefs of LSD as a psychotherapeutic tool, Grof had one female patient who suddenly became convinced she had assumed the identity of a female of a species of prehistoric reptile. During the course of her hallucination, she not only gave a richly detailed description of what it felt like to be encapsuled in such a form, but noted that the portion of the male of the species's anatomy was a patch of colored scales on the side of its head.


 No.109800

What was startling to Grof was that although the woman had no prior knowledge about such things, a conversation with a zoologist later confirmed that in certain species of reptiles colored areas on the head do indeed play an important role as triggers of sexual arousal.

The woman's experience was not unique. During the course of his research, Grof encountered examples of patients regressing and identifying with virtually every species on the evolutionary tree (research findings which helped influence the man-into-ape scene in the movie Altered States). Moreover, he found that such experiences frequently contained obscure zoological details which turned out to be accurate.

Regressions into the animal kingdom were not the only puzzling psychological phenomena Grof encountered. He also had patients who appeared to tap into some sort of collective or racial unconscious. Individuals with little or no education suddenly gave detailed descriptions of Zoroastrian funerary practices and scenes from Hindu mythology. In other categories of experience, individuals gave persuasive accounts of out-of-body journeys, of precognitive glimpses of the future, of regressions into apparent past-life incarnations.

In later research, Grof found the same range of phenomena manifested in therapy sessions which did not involve the use of drugs. Because the common element in such experiences appeared to be the transcending of an individual's consciousness beyond the usual boundaries of ego and/or limitations of space and time, Grof called such manifestations "transpersonal experiences", and in the late '60s he helped found a branch of psychology called "transpersonal psychology" devoted entirely to their study.

Although Grof's newly founded Association of Transpersonal Psychology garnered a rapidly growing group of like-minded professionals and has become a respected branch of psychology, for years neither Grof or any of his colleagues were able to offer a mechanism for explaining the bizarre psychological phenomena they were witnessing. But that has changed with the advent of the holographic paradigm.

As Grof recently noted, if the mind is actually part of a continuum, a labyrinth that is connected not only to every other mind that exists or has existed, but to every atom, organism, and region in the vastness of space and time itself, the fact that it is able to occasionally make forays into the labyrinth and have transpersonal experiences no longer seems so strange.

The holographic prardigm also has implications for so-called hard sciences like biology. Keith Floyd, a psychologist at Virginia Intermont College, has pointed out that if the concreteness of reality is but a holographic illusion, it would no longer be true to say the brain produces consciousness. Rather, it is consciousness that creates the appearance of the brain – as well as the body and everything else around us we interpret as physical.


 No.109801

Such a turnabout in the way we view biological structures has caused researchers to point out that medicine and our understanding of the healing process could also be transformed by the holographic paradigm. If the apparent physical structure of the body is but a holographic projection of consciousness, it becomes clear that each of us is much more responsible for our health than current medical wisdom allows. What we now view as miraculous remissions of disease may actually be due to changes in consciousness which in turn effect changes in the hologram of the body.

Similarly, controversial new healing techniques such as visualization may work so well because in the holographic domain of thought images are ultimately as real as "reality".

Even visions and experiences involving "non-ordinary" reality become explainable under the holographic paradigm. In his book "Gifts of Unknown Things," biologist Lyall Watson discribes his encounter with an Indonesian shaman woman who, by performing a ritual dance, was able to make an entire grove of trees instantly vanish into thin air. Watson relates that as he and another astonished onlooker continued to watch the woman, she caused the trees to reappear, then "click" off again and on again several times in succession.

Although current scientific understanding is incapable of explaining such events, experiences like this become more tenable if "hard" reality is only a holographic projection.

Perhaps we agree on what is "there" or "not there" because what we call consensus reality is formulated and ratified at the level of the human unconscious at which all minds are infinitely interconnected.

If this is true, it is the most profound implication of the holographic paradigm of all, for it means that experiences such as Watson's are not commonplace only because we have not programmed our minds with the beliefs that would make them so. In a holographic universe there are no limits to the extent to which we can alter the fabric of reality.

What we perceive as reality is only a canvas waiting for us to draw upon it any picture we want. Anything is possible, from bending spoons with the power of the mind to the phantasmagoric events experienced by Castaneda during his encounters with the Yaqui brujo don Juan, for magic is our birthright, no more or less miraculous than our ability to compute the reality we want when we are in our dreams.

Indeed, even our most fundamental notions about reality become suspect, for in a holographic universe, as Pribram has pointed out, even random events would have to be seen as based on holographic principles and therefore determined. Synchronicities or meaningful coincidences suddenly makes sense, and everything in reality would have to be seen as a metaphor, for even the most haphazard events would express some underlying symmetry.

Whether Bohm and Pribram's holographic paradigm becomes accepted in science or dies an ignoble death remains to be seen, but it is safe to say that it has already had an influence on the thinking of many scientists. And even if it is found that the holographic model does not provide the best explanation for the instantaneous communications that seem to be passing back and forth between subatomic particles, at the very least, as noted by Basil Hiley, a physicist at Birbeck College in London, Aspect's findings "indicate that we must be prepared to consider radically new views of reality".


 No.109802

Vanguard notes…

This is one of the most fascinating files we have seen since it seems to offer a hypothesis which "synthesizes" a multitude of phenomena including that generally classed as "paranormal." Related files on KeelyNet are the complete MIND series and VEDA1.


 No.109803


 No.109806

ty for esoteric teachings m8


 No.109810

Happy 1500BC.


 No.109811

1Why, O LORD, do you stand far away?

Why do you hide yourself in times of trouble?

2In arrogance the wicked hotly pursue the poor;

let them be caught in the schemes that they have devised.

3For the wicked boasts of the desires of his soul,

and the one greedy for gain curses and renounces the LORD.

4In the pride of his face the wicked does not seek him;

all his thoughts are, “There is no God.”

5His ways prosper at all times;

your judgments are on high, out of his sight;

as for all his foes, he puffs at them.

6He says in his heart, “I shall not be moved;

throughout all generations I shall not meet adversity.”

7His mouth is filled with cursing and deceit and oppression;

under his tongue are mischief and iniquity.

8He sits in ambush in the villages;

in hiding places he murders the innocent.

His eyes stealthily watch for the helpless;

9he lurks in ambush like a lion in his thicket;

he lurks that he may seize the poor;

he seizes the poor when he draws him into his net.

10The helpless are crushed, sink down,

and fall by his might.

11He says in his heart, “God has forgotten,

he has hidden his face, he will never see it.”


 No.109825


 No.109854

This is dumb as fuck. Quantum mechanics is a spook. Particles manipulate a field that other particles are in. If you move one part of the field the other parts of the field move too. This is physical, mechanical connection. It's the same thing as moving a rock and going "OH MY FUCKING GOD I JUST PINCHED AND MOVED TWO SIDES OF THIS ROCK BUT THE WHOLE FUCKING THING MOVED". Jesus fucking christ.

Members of a set affect other members of a set and the set itself (mind blown dude that's some deep fucking shit) WOW DUDE SO IF I WRAP MY BODY IN THESE FABRICS THEY MOVE WITH ME???? WHAT THE FUCK DUDE AS ABOVE SO BELOW OHMYGODIMCUMMIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGG


 No.109947

>>109854

t. brainlet

Thats the fucking point.

What you fail to understand is that there's a (very) minute delay - A object wont move with you simultaneously. The delay is the speed of sound for that object.


 No.109965

>>109947

So objects that move faster than the speed of sound fall apart? Wait…

You're retarded. You mean the speed of light if anything.


 No.110476

File: a2152a16590afc8⋯.png (46.66 KB, 176x225, 176:225, 1506221249523.png)

>read mind over medicine

>it throws me over to the intention experiment and Talbot's holographic universe

>seems to be bullshit but also seems to make sense

>all the skeptics online are all literal reddit tier "I will intention a 5million dollar shopping spree for myself in 5 seconds 5..4…3…2…1… WHOA NOTHING HAPPENED CAN YOU BELIEVE PEOPLE BELIEVE THIS SHIT"

>While many citations in both books are shot down, a few such as the Saint's blood and the french revolution visit do in fact stand out.

I'm not really sure what to believe. But intention, reality engenderment by focused thought, and seeking higher patterns with meditation and lsd do support some of the things I've read on spontaneous healing a la Dispenza and miracles

Anyone have good, non-bullshit books on these matters? I'd really like to expand my scope and not deal with hayhouse publications


 No.110478

>europeanis


 No.110506

File: a6a554a90f3f437⋯.gif (2.95 MB, 850x1042, 425:521, ____happy_halloween_____by….gif)

Phantasm. Yuck! [ - ]


 No.110541

>>110476

I think Lynne McTaggart has a book over holographic universe also, but also has the same kind of up in the air credibility intention expirement has


 No.111007

Any good resources on this?


 No.111008

File: f181f0dd53629bb⋯.jpg (62.22 KB, 640x360, 16:9, formless-consciousness.jpg)

>>109794

That was a good read. Thank you for this quality thread lad.

I remember i was with my dad and his friend one day about a year ago, looking for bits and pieces around the home county. We stopped at a village called Tempo, looked for some piece for a tilly lamp. After that we crossed the street into a pub for a couple of pints. My fathers friend is a musician, he plays the accordion and as far as i knew back then it was all he could play.

So as we sat at the bar i was thinking about the so called "Law of Attraction" and i was thinking it was a load of dung, but i realised i was not giving it a chance and that i really do not know, so i decided that right there and then i would test it out.

I decided that i would put all my faith in making a scenario happen where my dads friend would for what ever reason and means start playing a tenor banjo that i had pictured in my head. (I should say that i seen no instrument about at all). I made myself believe it would happen and was just waiting, knowing it would. It was about 15 mins till the barman went under the bar and pulled out a small, shitty, beaten, three string brown banjo out and handed my da's friend. He started to tune it and play it. It was not the banjo i had in my mind but i still insisted that it would show up. 5-10 mins later and sure enough it happened, the barman handed him the same one i thought up and he began playing it! WTF? Part of me was not even surprised though, because i believed it was going to happen.

I have tried it again a few times, like recently i tried to make a fox appear in my garden, but nothing. However i do not think i invested as much faith as the time it worked so i don't fucking know what to believe.


 No.111113

>>111008

I've had similar experiences. I think it worked with the banjo because you were doing it on a lark and weren't really attaching any significance to it. It's much harder to do when you're aware that success essentially means you're God. Suddenly, all your beliefs about how the world work, about how you are only a part of reality rather than the source of everything, are in conflict with your belief that the fox will show up as commanded, or whatever it is you're trying to do. Your belief about the fox is lightweight compared to your belief that you are not all-powerful and can change reality at will.

My eyesight is kind of crap, but I was sitting around thinking about this one day a few weeks ago and decided to just believe intensely that my eyesight was perfect. Instantly, my eyesight was utterly crystal clear. I could see better than I've ever remembered seeing in my life. It lasted probably less than 2 seconds, before my surprise and disbelief that I could just decide to have perfect vision came flooding in and instantly my eyes were back to normal. I remember Frater X on Youtube, who has the very good MindAndMagick channel, describes doing something like this with a cut on his hand: it instantly healed before his eyes, but as he did a double-take with shock, the healing stopped and he was left with a bit of the cut remaining. I've heard a few faith healers talk about this exact same phenomenon.

I don't think the key is about believing something very intensely. The Bible says specifically that you only need faith like a mustard seed. It's the disbelief that kills it. Disbelief is belief in the opposite direction, which is apparently the only thing strong enough to stop you from altering reality with your beliefs.


 No.111116

>>111113

How are you supposed to deal with disbelief ?


 No.111133

>>111116

>How are you supposed to deal with disbelief ?

There are a few ways. Hypnotists put their subject in a deep trance to bypass the "critical factor" that weighs propositions and rejects them based on prior beliefs. You can read about people like Dolores Cannon who pioneered a technique of putting clients into very deep trances and then telling them that some health problem they had was healed, at which point many people experienced miraculous healings. You see systems like AVARI that work on similar principles.

Another way might be repetition. If you repeat a mantra or an affirmation for long enough, you might be able to brute-force it into becoming a belief. Bardon called it "autosuggestion" I believe.

Phineas Quimby was a proponent of the idea that reason alone was enough to bring about miracles; he was a watch-maker and a healer who believed that all problems were caused by erroneous beliefs, and erroneous beliefs could be corrected with the use of pure reason, at which point whatever the problem was would correct itself as well.

Then of course you have Neville Goddard with the "feel it real" method: if you feel the emotions of your wish already being fulfilled and make that your dominant mental state, you "die" to the old reality and are "born again" into reality that matches your new state.


 No.111135

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>111133

The last one reminds me of this:

/fringe/res/104268.html


 No.111194

>>109854

>Being this angry at anything that isn't unnecessary suffering.

Why the unbridled emotion? Who hurt you man? You can tell us.


 No.111195

File: aee9a6a70d2a0ee⋯.jpg (114.63 KB, 640x480, 4:3, Crying-Anime-Girl-anime-gi….jpg)


 No.111196

It is very interesting and quite provocative.

After reading the posts it seems the best place to begin formulating a solid opinion regarding that which is suggested is to carry out some experiments on a personal level. This however introduces a number of openings through which bias may enter.

There may be no more continents to discover, but there still remains an abundance of mystery in the world.


 No.111199

File: d8d5f78ee7319e1⋯.jpg (35.84 KB, 728x500, 182:125, 181898605f39c86c81e18fceab….jpg)


 No.111200

File: d88755c613eb917⋯.jpg (70.3 KB, 675x507, 225:169, d476bf8edcca5ebfb81e6ca815….jpg)


 No.111205

Retaliation is not a matter of one being hurt, but rather it is a matter of justice bad declaring what is right amidst the workers of iniquity who work falsehood.


 No.111206

>>111205

If what I'm am saying was not true then you would be able to speak about the matter in a direct way, but you are not able, demonstrating that you are without proper authority to declare right or wrong and such things as this.


 No.111214

>>111205

>>111206

Who are (you) talking to?


 No.111271

>>111113

Yes, you make a lot of sense. I theorize that you need to stay detached from it. It is like this Hindu or Buddhist story i can't remember, one of the two anyways, were this man learns to fly but he had to be in a completely detached state or he would fall to his death. Then one day he flew past a woman so beautiful he just for one moment lost the state of mind needed and fell.


 No.111476

Objective reality exist, different dimension from subjective reality, and they mesh with each other through a bridge dimension, you can alter objective reality by changing the subjective reality, there is no holograms, the universe is a vast energetic construct, the mind is the link,bridge, the magick circle is the lab with which you can alter both realities.


 No.111477

The whole in every part is even present in our cellular structure ,which is why we can clone sheep and such.


 No.111515

>>111271

I think perhaps it's not so much about detachment as it is about judgement. To judge a thing is to give it power over you. It is to say that it is separate and outside of yourself, when in reality all things exist within your consciousness. So often, when we want to change a circumstance in our life, we judge it, and I think often this is what prevents us from changing it. When you realize that all things are part of the one that is you, you forgive all and judge not. That's the real meaning of Christianity, I believe. When Jesus tells his disciples how to work miracles in Mark 11, he first tells them to have faith and to pray as though what they desired was already received (feel the emotion of the wish fulfilled and don't diverge from it - remain faithful to it). And then in the next sentence he tells them to forgive everyone. That last part always confused me. What does forgiveness have to do with miracle-working?

You forgive because true forgiveness is integration with self. It is taking responsibility for everything you are conscious of because nothing is outside of you. You can't change anything outside of yourself. You can't bend the spoon; you must realize that the spoon in part of you, and it is you that bends. I heard a Kabbalist say once that if you want to exercise the power of God, you have to act like God. God assumes total responsibility, because that is the price of omnipotence. If it's true that you can change the world by changing yourself, then reality is a mirror, and only reflects you. You don't judge the mirror.


 No.111527

>>111515

I never seen The Matrix but today i decided to look up that scene about the spoon for no reason at all. Then just before i came here to check this thread i was listening to a lecture and pretty much was about this

> When you realize that all things are part of the one that is you, you forgive all and judge not

That was odd. It was the one thing that i took from it to contemplate on.

>You forgive because true forgiveness is integration with self. It is taking responsibility for everything you are conscious of because nothing is outside of you. You can't change anything outside of yourself. You can't bend the spoon; you must realize that the spoon in part of you, and it is you that bends. I heard a Kabbalist say once that if you want to exercise the power of God, you have to act like God. God assumes total responsibility, because that is the price of omnipotence. If it's true that you can change the world by changing yourself, then reality is a mirror, and only reflects you. You don't judge the mirror.

That is solid stuff, makes a lot of sense to me.


 No.111530


 No.125282

I do not know what lies beyond Saturn.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / arepa / ausneets / tacos / vg / vichan / zoo ]