/fringe/ - Fringe

==How this is done:== 1. Break the universe down into a set of abstractions, label those abstractions, create a symbol for each of those abstractions, organize those symbols based on the relationships between those abstractions, relate these abstractions with other closely related abstractions, compare and contrast this system of abstractions with other systems of abstractions, create from this a better system of symbols representations labelled abstractions, and finally symbolize and label this system of abstractions and its sub-systems of abstractions. This should be done repeatedly within the Magic community in order to create 1. The ideal symbols, 2. The ideal systems of symbols, 3. The ideal abstractions, 4. The ideal relationship web of abstractions, and 5. The ideal symbolized, labelled, related, system of abstractions.

2. Unify the aforementioned methods in tandem with philosophies, political philosophies, study philosophies, ideological philosophies, theories, and memes.

3. Introduce these systems to people interested in the aforementioned concepts in order to alter how they organize these concepts in their minds. For instance, introduce a symbolic system related to discrimination to feminists and supremacists, or introduce a symbolic system related to sexuality to LGBT members and people interested in sex.

4. Do this enough to where the Hiveminds built around the aforementioned concepts and people which fuel those concepts, are altered in a way which is beneficial. For instance, there is the Feminist Hivemind, the Democrat Hivemind, the Pepe Hivemind, the Anal Sex Hivemind, and Intersectional Hiveminds such as the Black Female Hivemind, Nazi Trumpist Hivemind, etcetera.

==Concluding thoughts:== Magic is bullshit because it's imaginary and based on imaginary things. That means you can effectively affect other things that are bullshit with bullshit occultism. You can only alter an imaginary reality with an imagination-oriented applied method. Thus, only when one can admit magic is imaginary bullshit, can one fully comprehend magic's applications in manipulating imaginary bullshit. There is nothing more bullshit than the hegemonic hiveminds of thought manipulating us on a collective large scale, so we could stand to consciously work toward better alternative hiveminds.

~Epyc Wynn

>>123681

>>123683

I am Epyc Wynn and the OP's posts are mine.

I will post a clown emoji on Twitter 1 minute after this post's timestamp.

https://twitter.com/EpycWynn

~Epyc Wynn

>>123692

Twitter's timestamps are a tad on the broken side for some reason. It says 7:15pm on my end despite it having been posted at 10:16pm.

~Epyc Wynn

>>123661

>you're so close yet so far

r/iamverysmart

>>123700

Let me metasplain the average in-depth discussion between two opposing viewpoints to you.

>Me: "Observation."

<You: "Your observation is wrong."

>Me: "Why?"

<You: "Because I said so."

>Me: "Can you do better?"

<You: "Fine." *lifts leg and proceeds to shit propaganda and fallacies all over the place*

>Me: "I disagree."

<You: "Why?"

>Me: "Because all you did is shit excessive verbose propaganda and fallacious logic everywhere."

<You: "Argue why it's wrong if you disagree."

>Me: "But that wastes a ton of time."

<You: "Ha looks like you lose."

>Me: "Fine." *proceeds to clean up the shit*

<You: "I disagree." *shits more*

>Me: *cleans more*

<You: *excessive shitting noises*

>Me: *excessive cleaning noises*

And nothing will be accomplished because I'll see shit where you see sparkles.

So what do we do about this divide? Do we concede we're both sure the other person is wrong while fully believing we ourselves are right?

Simply put, I embody my truth, you experience your fallacy, and we both feel on some level that we're absolutely right.

That is the inherent problem with philosophy and mysticism: you can't prove mysticism to anyone but yourself, and you can't prove philosophy outside of systems of logic and rhetoric which can always be circumvented through other systems of logic and rhetoric.

I'm sure of myself and you're sure of yourself. I believe you're wrong because I embody an existence which dictates this to be true. You believe I'm wrong because your experiences and desires led you to this conclusion. But we can't do anything outside of make fanciful claims so we're fucked no matter how much effort, logic, or rhetoric we put in.

With all of that in mind, I claim you have no legitimate basis for your statement. I make this claim on the seemingly ignorant basis of "I said so," with no other logical or rhetorical validity to support this claim, because let's face it: IN MAGIC EVERYTHING IS COMPLETE FUCKING BULLSHIT!

~Epyc Wynn

>>123705

Same fam.

Image related.

~Epyc Wynn

>>123721

>state you believe it is wrong that i claim to observe a complete view

>state you actually meant i was right

>state that i have missed the light of what you meant

If I went around making contradictions and vague wordings, most people would miss the "light" of what I mean too. But that would be my own fault, and I would own responsibility for that without mocking others for my own bad-to-misleading conveyance.

~Epyc Wynn

The board has become well-populated with maps of symbols representing abstractions.

However, I'd remind you all that we cannot move forward unless we make our own ORIGINAL symbols of UNIQUELY chosen abstractions UNIQUELY connected together in our own ORIGINAL systems of symbols.

Think of it like making a comic book with no dialogue and symbols instead of detailed artwork in boxes. Give it flow and purpose. Make it an original creation.

Don't try to be perfect; try to try to be perfect. That is to say, don't get hung up on being perfect, so much as valuing the attempt itself. The more attempts we have to compare and contrast, the closer we can get to finalizing a TRULY perfect system of systems of labeled symbols representing abstractions, as a means of influencing people to think better.

All we are, are cartographers of the mind's abstractions.

Some Mozart for inspiration.

~Epyc Wynn

>>123630

Magic is a product of expanding consciousness. Expanding awareness. Maybe just a byproduct.

More awareness, higher sensitivity to the invisible, exploration of causal relationships related to the invisible.

>>123899

Thanks for the understanding.

Though, I sincerely doubt leaders and creators are given a fair enough shot in life for you to assume they're rare, instead of considering they're just unable to make a name for themselves due to limits they're uniquely faced with.

~Epyc Wynn

You have as much magic as this guy

>>125474

God I love having the magical power of being a forgettable anime character. Right up there with plot armor and anime logic.

~Epyc Wynn

>>125577

Egotism is wrong because it requires you to love yourself at the cost of devaluing the importance of others.

So if I just love myself a lot AND love others a lot, then it balances out.

Nothing wrong with having a fun with an imaginary identity. Not like I actually need it in order to enjoy life.

~Epyc Wynn

>>123661

You know what else is close?

HURRRRNNNNNGHHHHH!!!!!!!

Here it comes my slave!!

BRAAAAAAAAAAAAP

>>130758

Some day i will become like you.

>>130759

I believe you!

>>130769

idk who the op.. [redacted], is.

>>123630

This is a good point, magick can be used to manipulate the collective consciousness because we in a sense are part of that already. And politics and culture are expressions of the collective consciousness.