>>20691For one, I assume he doesn't plan to reproduce and if he doesn't endorse cultural degeneracy it shouldn't be an issue.
If he understands that being lustful, no matter who or what you are attracted to, is wrong and his energies are misdirected toward the honey pot of negativity that is "LGBTBBQ culture" it doesn't matter what he thinks he's attracted to. Desires are illusory and can be conquered if they work against our wills.
On a primal material level, sexuality is for reproduction. When this is harnessed with the will, it becomes a source for creation and procreation (birth). Obviously homosexuals would be exception since they generally don't reproduce except in a degenerate society like ours, one that hides them in "beards" for fear of cultural repercussion, or one that tells them they can emulate the male-female hetero polarity.
The toxic thing however is "homo culture" and the degeneracy that comes with it. Do you agree? If someone knows that homo culture is degenerate yet they are homosexual, they should be fine and understand that sexual identity is illusory and only a matter of the life that one is incarnated into.
>>20654Celibacy is one path that people have chosen. Others of us in the "renouncing lust" thread have learned to retain the seed, and I think this is a viable means of conquering lust and harnessing your creative energy.
Spilling your seed left and right and succumbing to lust is just a waste of your vitality no matter who or what you think you're attracted to, and if you haven't already you should definitely consider this path.
Gay men have an issue in that their energies are positive-positive so it always ends up being a volatile clash of wills. Too much sexual passion and lost energy, no one gains anything and it ruins the men who try to emulate the feminine.
Gay women on the other hand are negative-negative, and what ends up happening is "bed death" where they no longer have sexual passion having sucked it out of each other instead of creating a full energy circuit. No one gains anything.
>>20692>>20693I wouldn't read too much into it.
There's a commentary on some works by Franz Bardon that explains that as an individual, being attracted to the same sex is not a big deal.
http://www.abardoncompanion.de/Culturally, it's probably not good to endorse however. Our culture loves lust no matter what form it's in, and LGBTQ is the big trend that makes SWPLs look all cultured and enlightened while the world our forefathers built degenerates around them. silly mundanes
Again, no matter what sexuality or gender or genital configuration you have, it's always renouncing or controlling lust and preventing loss of the seed (or orgasm), it's tremendous for inner development and conquering other inner defects. If these are not an issue for you (e.g. being asexual due to hormones or something), you have one less obstacle but should look to conquer other vices and aspects of yourself to exercise your Will.
As an aside, Jack Donovan, the author of The Way of Men is a homo, but he's a respectable man and doesn't wear this around as his identity. He basically just isn't a faggot.
(makes me wonder if there's some kind of homo conspiracy to hijack the MGTOW movement and steer men away from women)
But anyway, I wouldn't endorse homosexuality at all but I am sympathetic to people who want to learn regardless. All I can do is point you in the right direction, and you'll find there are many resources available to everyone who has the will to dive into them.
>>20698It affects your life experience and can shape how you view the world. It's just one more obstacle that needs to be overcome or compensated for. That's all. We just don't know much about it firsthand, I can only intuit and guess at what one must do in that position.
men with low testosterone for example or women with low sex hormone generally have diminished will, but will *can* be accomplished in spite of a physical weakness (see Mind Power by Atkinson)