>>58067
>You have a degree of hubris in that you think you can overcome the intellect of other humans simply because you have accepted many of the best practices and opinions our society has to offer, you choose not to think for yourself
I don't know how this is relevant or why you should assume this to be true. You really shouldn't throw out baseless assumptions about other people. Besides, the "best practices and opinions our society our society has to offer" is a culturally relative viewpoint. Sure, on /sci/ my viewpoint may be more common but I think on /fringe/ it is very uncommon. Do you to have hubris simply because you have accepted many of the best practises and opinions /fringe/ has to offer, and choose not to think for yourself? Of course, this is a bit of a "you too, you too" thing here and I really think this whole line of debate is counterproductive.
>So you assume that your reality is the same as that experienced by others, or that you (being special) have some kind of access to reality that represents truth greater than others'?
That's an interesting philosophical question but I think we are getting a bit far a field here.
Reality may be arbitrary but not inconsistent. Ultimately, the same basic physical principles must underlie the viewpoint of me and another person even if these principles are ultimately so arbitrary as to be that person A experiences event A and person B experiences event B. However, the notion of time and the seeming infinitude of space and physical quantities seems to me to imply some form of recursion (or integrals or any other mathematical way of representing time) and some kind of inherent structure to this world that is common to the viewpoints of everybody. If reality really is arbitrary why do I experience a consistent time line of events from my perspective and why is space and matter around me arranged in an orderly manner?
I would think that the viewpoint of Sophism if any viewpoint would be the one that assumes a special truth greater than others.