TWO readings from Twilight Language for the Day of Ra-Hoor-Khuit:
ANTICHRIST - In the New Testament of the Bible, the term "antichrist" is used to collectively describe those who deny the existence of the flesh-and-blood Jesus as the "Son of God". In later use, and especially today, the two Beasts and False Prophet of the Book of the Apocalypse or Revelation are conflated into a composite end-times tyrant who is a pawn or even incarnation of Satan and referred to as the (singular) Antichrist.
Comparable figures also exist in Judaism and Islam. For medieval Jews, the anti-Messiah Armilus is an oppressor who will conquer Jerusalem and persecute the Jews until being destroyed by the true Messiah or directly by Jehovah. For the Muslims, al-Masih ad-Dajjal, the Deceiving Messiah, is one who will appear and impersonate the true Messiah. While Armilus is said to be partially maimed and leprous, ad-Dajjal is said to be blind in one eye.
But if the Antichrist is a counterfeit and Great Deceiver of the masses as is so often said, there are issues that we must consider. Those Gnostic sects which distinguish the Christ ("Anointed") spirit from Jesus as a man - and thus considered antichrists, themselves, according to orthodoxy as described above - held that the Christ was a liberating spirit opposed to the Demiurge or Master of this World and its servants, the Archons ("Rulers"), who work to keep souls in ignorance and bondage.
If we consider the Christ in this sense, we must ask: What has been the oppressor of the Spirit? What has been the suppressor of knowledge? What has shed the blood of countless men, women and children in tyranny? And yet…who has been mindlessly adored as an idol by the masses? Who or what, then, is the Antichrist? The answer is obvious: the historicized Jesus of the churches and the doctrines of blind faith, Self-sacrifice, obedience and the fetishization of weakness and poverty.
See BLACK SUN, ESCHATON and FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE.
…and the other…
STAR-SPONGE VISION - A vision experienced by Aleister Crowley in 1916 e.v. He described it in comments on the Book of the Law and in his autobiography as follows:
"I was on a retirement in a cottage overlooking Lake Pasquaney in New Hampshire. I lost consciousness of everything but a universal space in which were innumerable bright points, and I realized this as a physical representation of the universe, in what I may call its essential structure. I exclaimed, 'Nothingness with twinkles!' I concentrated upon this vision, with the result that the void space which had been the principal element of it diminished in importance; space appeared to be ablaze, yet the radiant points were not confused, and I thereupon completed my sentence with the exclamation, 'but what twinkles!'
"The next stage of this vision led to an identification of the blazing points with the stars of the firmament, with ideas, souls, etc. I perceived also that each star was connected by a ray of light with each other star. In the world of ideas each thought possessed a necessary relation with each other thought; each such relation is of course a thought in itself; each such ray is itself a star. It is here that the logical difficulty first presents itself. The seer has a direct perception of infinite series. Logically, therefore, it would appear as if the entire space must be filled up with a homogeneous blaze of light. This however is not the case. The space is completely full and yet the monads which fill it are perfectly distinct. The ordinary reader might well exclaim that such statements exhibit symptoms of mental confusion."
See THELEMA.