I'm looking for some information on a topic that I can't seem to find much about. It relates specifically to sacred geometry. The topic is essentially about the fundamental building blocks of creation, specifically, when you take points/circles/spheres, align them such that they are all equidistant from each other, and observe what you get as a result. It seems everyone stops at the second dimension and goes no further. I've seen plenty of attempts at 3D sacred geometry but they're often just mimicing the 2D patterns without properly transitioning to 3D. For those that can already tell what I'm getting at based on what you've read so far and the image, please go ahead and skip to the last paragraph, since what follows is just my observations which may not be very valuable to you.
The split in the first dimension goes from one point to three, giving you light, dark, and everything in between. In the seed of life, we can see a more interesting pattern emerge, with distinct colors and a rainbow center, though we are left with the question of light and dark; where do they go and how do they fit on the seed of life? Is the center dark, light, or neutral? This is a question I've been seeking to answer, and I've finally found it. The seed of life is on a plane that is tangential to light and dark, meaning that the center could be depicted as light or dark and both would be correct. However, this observation is only obvious when you look at it three dimensionally. One of the things that you wont find on the internet is the 3D version of the seed of life. The closest you will find is a cuboctohedron, a 3 dimensional solid with vector equilibrium, meaning, all the points are equidistant from each other - exactly what is needed for the 3D seed of life. When we apply our knowledge of the previous splits to this shape, something amazing happens; the significant points are not the vertices but the sides themselves, because they are where the spheres intersect when they are overlapping at one radius apart from each other, and is the 3D equivalent of the petals in the seed of life. It explains a missing link in color, why cyan, yellow, and magenta look brighter, and why red, blue, and green look darker. Also why RGB is used in additive color schemes, and CYM is used in subtractive color schemes. You can also see that the same pattern applies to the secondary colors, with secondaries closer to black being darker and the secondaries closer to white being lighter. That was another thing I always wondered, why colors like CYM seemed brighter; it's because we are missing a dimension in how we observe color. I don't know if this is new information or not, though I assure you I tried looking for it everywhere, forcing me to make these images myself. Something worth noting is that this pattern also coincides with the star tetrahedron, a symbol that is often accredited substantial metaphysical importance, though I only now truly understand its significance, which is that it points exclusively to the 8 primary triangular sides of the cuboctohedron. Another interesting observation is that these 8 primary sides are the product of the first two dimensional splits coming together; the first two (light/dark) from the initial 1D split, and the six from the 2D split. the center stays the same in all of these instances, therefor resulting in 8 unique primary elements coming from the center by the second dimensional split.
I want to know what this shape looks like in 3D, with the spheres accurately representing what's going on and intersecting to create the proper colors, but since I don't have the programming know-how to make it work, I'm hoping someone else knows. I'd also love to know more about what these shapes at these intersections look like, specifically the three "petals" of the 8 triangular faces, and the 6 secondary square faces. I believe the triangular faces result in reuleaux tetrahedrons, but I'm not sure. I have no clue with the squares, however. If anyone out there knows about this expansion of sacred geometry, please inform me!